<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MikeJandreau &#187; lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikejandreau.com/tag/lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikejandreau.com</link>
	<description>Designer. Writer. Musician. Movie Snob.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lens Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.mikejandreau.com/lens-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikejandreau.com/lens-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikejandreau.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wife and I are headed to D.C. this weekend, for a long weekend away to celebrate her birthday (which is tomorrow.) To prepare, I ordered a new &#8220;wide angle&#8221; lens for my Canon Digital Rebel XTi.  Being the thrifty shopper that I am, I decided to give the Sigma lens a chance.  It was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wife and I are headed to D.C. this weekend, for a long weekend away to celebrate her birthday (which is tomorrow.)</p>
<p>To prepare, I ordered a new &#8220;wide angle&#8221; lens for my Canon Digital Rebel XTi.  Being the thrifty shopper that I am, I decided to give the Sigma lens a chance.  It was my first non-Canon lens, so I was a bit scared, but I went ahead and did it anyway.</p>
<p>According to various photography websites, this lense is just about as good as Canon&#8217;s version, but at $400 less, I figured I should give it a shot.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t taken it out to shoot with it, yet, just did a test here in my living room.  Though I can say I&#8217;m impressed that it comes with a lens hood.  No Canon lens I ever bought did that.  Anyway. Here&#8217;s the four different shots I took, with my four lenses, to compare them.</p>
<p>[singlepic id=911 w=320 h=240 float=center]<br />
[singlepic id=908 w=320 h=240 float=center]<br />
[singlepic id=909 w=320 h=240 float=center]<br />
[singlepic id=910 w=320 h=240 float=center]</p>
<p>The first image was taken with the stock 18-55mm lens from Canon.<br />
The second was taken with a 60mm Macro lens, also from Canon.<br />
The third was taken with a 75-300mm Zoom lens, from Canon.<br />
The fourth was taken with the new Sigma 10-20 lens.</p>
<p>As you can see, the 60mm Macro lens and the 75-300mm Zoom are pretty much the same.   The 18-55 and the 10-20 are pretty significantly different though.</p>
<p>Just to be clear, these shots were all taken from the exact same spot. The camera was mounted on a tripod, and I only touched it to change out the lenses on the body.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll report back, post D.C., with out the Sigma lense fared when used in the &#8220;real world,&#8221;, but according to my living room test, I&#8217;m pretty happy. It takes shots exactly how I wanted, zoomed really far out.  It makes my living room look freakin&#8217; huge, too. Kudos for that.  Check back in a week, and I&#8217;ll put up the photos from D.C., of which I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;ll be 90 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikejandreau.com/lens-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
